vault backup: 2026-07-27 09:30:30
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
|
||||
# {{title}}
|
||||
|
||||
- 🟡 **Proposed** — Decision is being considered; not final yet.
|
||||
- 🟢 **Decided** — Decision has been made and is currently valid.
|
||||
- 🔴 **Rejected** — Option/proposal was explicitly considered and rejected.
|
||||
- ⚫ **Superseded** — Was previously a valid decision, but a newer decision replaced it.
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Status:** 🟡 Proposed
|
||||
**Decision Owner:**
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-07-27
|
||||
**Status:** 🟢 **Decided**
|
||||
**Decision Owner:** Amadou
|
||||
**People Involved:** Amadou, Mohammed B
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
New policy is forcing us to look at Canadian alternatives first. They needed to justify if they were American or not. If American and no employees in Canada, then I must submit an exception for this.
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Determine whether the procurement requirements and ongoing cost of Algolia justify replacing it with an alternative search platform.
|
||||
|
||||
Replacing Algolia would affect multiple websites and require significant integration work, including a review and reimplementation of the synchronization between Directus and Algolia.
|
||||
|
||||
## Options Considered
|
||||
|
||||
### Option 1
|
||||
|
||||
**Description:** Leaving them
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:** Could probably be cheaper using services like mielesearch or typesense
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:** Very expensive on integration of all websites and full review of the sync code between Directus and Algolia
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
### Option 2
|
||||
|
||||
**Description:** Stay with them
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:** Nothing changes
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:** Still expensive.
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
What did we decide?
|
||||
Decision is to stay with Algolia
|
||||
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
|
||||
Why was this option chosen? Cheaper long term and less disruptive
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks / Trade-offs
|
||||
|
||||
What are we accepting by making this decision?
|
||||
|
||||
- We continue accepting Algolia's current recurring cost.
|
||||
- We may need to maintain a procurement exception.
|
||||
- This decision delays exploring potentially cheaper alternatives.
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ]
|
||||
- [ ]
|
||||
|
||||
## Outcome
|
||||
|
||||
_To be completed later._
|
||||
|
||||
What actually happened after the decision? Keeping the same stability in place. No need to redo and force a new system.
|
||||
|
||||
## Lessons Learned
|
||||
|
||||
What would I do differently next time? N/A
|
||||
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
|
||||
- [[]]
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user