vault backup: 2026-07-23 14:57:54

This commit is contained in:
2026-07-23 14:57:54 +02:00
parent 0527e561b3
commit 8526cf4212
12 changed files with 1084 additions and 799 deletions
@@ -1,103 +1,110 @@
# Risk Management
Duration: 3040 minutes
Duration: 30--40 minutes
## Definition
Identify, assess, mitigate, and monitor risks before they become project problems.
This lesson is part of the Project Management track and builds on the concepts learned in the previous lessons.
A **risk** is an uncertain event or condition that could affect the
project's outcome, schedule, scope, quality, cost, or operations. An
**issue** is a problem that is already happening.
## Simple Mental Model
The goal is not to add project-management bureaucracy. The goal is to make the project easier to understand, predict, and manage.
> **Risk = might happen. Issue = is happening.**
Good project management tries to identify important uncertainty before
it becomes a surprise.
## How It Works
We will examine this concept through four levels:
Use a lightweight four-step process:
1. What the concept means.
2. How a project owner should use it.
3. How you should review or challenge it as the manager.
4. How it should eventually appear in your project-management system.
1. **Identify** what could prevent the outcome or next milestone.
2. **Assess** probability and impact.
3. **Respond** by avoiding, mitigating, transferring/sharing, or
accepting the risk.
4. **Monitor** the important risks as the project changes.
You do not need fake numerical precision. Low / Medium / High is often
enough.
Example:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Risk Probability Impact Response Owner
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
DevOps Medium High Confirm Project owner
unavailable commitment
before QA early
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A dependency is something you know the project needs. A risk is
uncertainty around what might happen.
## Example
The exercises for this lesson should use real projects from your environment such as Umami, Mogador, QA automation, data governance, website/Product initiatives, or projects dependent on DevOps and Security.
The objective is to move from theory to a repeatable management practice.
Your project is on schedule, but Security has not reviewed an
architecture required for production. The deadline has not slipped yet,
but the unresolved review is a material risk. The project may already
deserve Yellow health.
## How It Fits Into the Bigger Picture
The course builds progressively:
- Project vs operations establishes what kind of work we are managing.
- Outcomes and Definition of Done establish what success means.
- Scope establishes the project's boundaries.
- Milestones establish meaningful progress.
- Dependencies, estimation, prioritization, capacity, risks, and health make delivery more predictable.
- Status reporting, meetings, ownership, and portfolio management make the system scalable.
- Closing and the final PM system turn the concepts into an operating method.
Dependencies tell you what the project needs. Estimation exposes
assumptions. Risk management asks what could make those assumptions
fail. \[\[Project Health\]\] then reflects important risks before
deadlines are actually missed.
## My Company / Real-World Context
Your team works across departmental projects, Product work, operational incidents, tickets, data, QA, SEO/WCAG, and dependencies on IT teams such as DevOps and Security.
Likely project risks in your environment include vendor delivery, DevOps
availability, Security approval, Product requirement changes,
operational interruptions, QA availability, data quality, and key-person
dependencies.
The lesson should therefore be applied to an environment where:
- Project owners are usually members of your own team rather than dedicated PMs.
- Operational work regularly interrupts project work.
- Product and IT are important cross-functional partners.
- You need portfolio-level visibility without personally maintaining every task.
- Project owners should increasingly draft and maintain their own project plans while you validate, challenge, prioritize, and escalate.
Focus on the few risks capable of materially changing delivery rather
than maintaining a huge register nobody reads.
## CTO Perspective
The leadership objective is to move progressively from personally coordinating work toward building a management system that produces reliable outcomes.
The expected progression is:
```text
Contributor → manages tasks
Project Owner → drives milestones and delivery
Manager → manages projects, priorities, risks and escalation
Technology Leader → manages portfolio, capacity, outcomes and organizational trade-offs
```
A project should not remain Green merely because nothing bad has
happened yet. Leadership status must be forward-looking.
### Questions to Ask
- What information do I need to make a management decision?
- What should the project owner be responsible for maintaining?
- What requires my intervention?
- What can be standardized across every project?
- Is the process helping delivery, or merely creating administration?
- What could prevent the next milestone?
- What assumptions are we relying on?
- Which risk has the highest impact?
- Who owns the response?
- What can we do now?
- What signal tells us the risk is becoming an issue?
- Does this risk change project health?
## Meeting Scenario
**Situation:**
A project owner gives you an update, but the information does not make it clear whether the project will achieve its intended outcome.
**Situation:** Security has not reviewed a required architecture and
production is approaching.
**Possible response:**
> Let's bring this back to the project plan. Show me where we are against the next meaningful checkpoint, what is at risk, and what decision or help you need from me.
> The milestone hasn't slipped yet, but the unresolved Security review
> is now a material delivery risk. Let's get a committed review date and
> escalate if that date threatens production.
## Key Takeaways
- The purpose of project management is predictable delivery, not documentation for its own sake.
- Project owners should own increasingly more of the planning and maintenance.
- Your role is to challenge assumptions, establish priorities, remove/escalate blockers, and manage the portfolio.
- Every concept learned should eventually contribute to one lightweight common project template.
- The final system should make exceptions and problems visible without requiring you to inspect every task.
- Risks are uncertain future events; issues are current problems.
- Identify risks before they become blockers.
- Focus on material risks.
- Assess probability and impact.
- Significant risks need an owner and response.
- Health should reflect major risks before a deadline is missed.
## Related Concepts
- [[Projects vs Operations]]
- [[Project Outcome]]
- [[Definition of Done]]
- [[Scope]]
- [[Milestone]]
- [[Dependencies]]
- [[Capacity]]
- [[Risk]]
- [[Project Health]]
- [[Portfolio Management]]
- \[\[Dependencies\]\]
- \[\[Project Health\]\]
- \[\[Estimation and Forecasting\]\]
- \[\[Capacity and WIP\]\]
- \[\[RAID\]\]