Files
SecondBrain/20 Work/Weekly Review/Weekly Review - 2026-07-27.md
T

1.8 KiB

Risks / Attention

QA capacity - upcoming projects

Status: 🔴 High

Four major projects are expected to reach QA close together.

Current QA capacity: 1 person.

Risk: QA becomes a bottleneck, delaying project delivery even if development finishes on schedule.

Proposed mitigation: Temporary freelance QA support during the overlapping QA period.

Discuss with CTO: 2026-07-27

Next step:

  • Determine how to manage QA capacity for September.
  • Get everything ready for ideally November so that in January, freelancer is ready

Related https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Eg588k87Bxsy_pTxxjc-xPuXfEiFMFJbqP3FD0FCvgg/edit?slide=id.g3db66fc5ba7_0_2#slide=id.g3db66fc5ba7_0_2


September - VP Project Portfolio Review

CTO informed me that VP wants a review of the team's projects in September.

Expected:

  • Projects currently being worked on
  • Current status / progress
  • Team members present
  • Team participation in presenting/discussing their work

Implication

Monday needs to accurately reflect the project portfolio before this meeting.

Project owners need to be comfortable explaining:

  • What are we trying to accomplish?
  • Where are we?
  • What is the next commitment?
  • When will it be delivered?
  • What is blocking us?

Next steps

  • Clean up project portfolio in Monday.
  • Establish regular project-owner updates.
  • Determine September presentation format.
  • Prepare team before VP review.

🟡 Umami

No progress during my two-week absence.

Project owner was reassigned to stabilization/fixes of website synchronization code.

Owner leaves on vacation Friday. When he returns, I will be on vacation.

Impact: Existing Umami dates are no longer realistic.

Next: Owner and I need to establish a new project timeline.